Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:44
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
World-First: Scientists Capture a Rare Lightning-Triggered Gamma-Ray Burst - SciTechDaily
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Meta held talks to buy Thinking Machines, Perplexity, and Safe Superintelligence - The Verge
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
If gays can get married, why can't I marry my dog or a cheeseburger?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
N.J. resident traps rabid raccoon, officials say - NJ.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What happens when you need emergency surgery in countries with universal healthcare vs the US?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Common Antibiotic Found To Tame Blood Pressure in Surprising New Role - SciTechDaily
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.